The Six Wives of Henry VIII Get Their Due


LONDON — Many British schoolchildren might be acquainted with the rhyme “Divorced, beheaded, died; divorced, beheaded, survived.” It was a typical mnemonic system to assist youngsters study the sequence of Henry VIII’s six wives.

Tudor-era portraits of monarchs, wives, and courtiers type a key section of the Nationwide Portrait Gallery’s central assortment. In its marketing campaign to attraction to youthful audiences, the museum has tried to flesh out these characters, with a vaguely feminist bent. It’s a canny transfer. Its new present is titled Six Lives: The Tales of Henry VIII’s Queens, versus “Six Wives.” Right here, curator Charlotte Bolland seeks to fill of their backstories and current them as people somewhat than supporting gamers to the principle character of the King.

The Sixteenth-century English Tudor king’s preliminary divorce from Katherine of Aragon to marry Anne Boleyn has the best historic significance — it precipitated the nation’s cataclysmic cut up from Catholicism and the creation of the Church of England — but the lore of the wives has endured within the standard creativeness, as they’ve appeared as characters in tv, performs, and musicals.

Nevertheless, at the same time as Bolland tries to elaborate on the ladies’s lives she comes up towards the dearth of main biographical sources. The present presents an expanded image of the courtroom’s workings and the on a regular basis gadgets folks used — not a nasty factor in any respect — however provides valuable little perception to the queens’ characters past what’s already identified from present key texts. Though we will pressure to interpret queenly apparel and symbols of their portraits, not a lot concrete data could be inferred. Anne Boleyn’s well-known portrait by an uknown artist is definitely a posthumous commemorative creation, we study, whereas Jane Seymour’s private heraldic badge, carved from Reigate stone round 1536, particulars a phoenix rising from a fort, from which Tudor roses bloom; the caption speculates that the phoenix, a logo of rebirth, could signify her reign “as a brand new starting.” There’s additionally Anne of Cleve’s 1539–40 account e book detailing lavish purchases of trendy English-style costume, funds to musicians, and, curiously, some playing money owed. 

With the captions, Bolland earnestly makes an attempt to forge connections between the objects and the wives. For a set of Sixteenth-century enjoying playing cards, we’re instructed, “On her method to England … Anne handed the time by studying card video games that Henry loved.” However not with these playing cards; there isn’t a indication that she both owned or used these specific playing cards. It goes on to explain how playing cards on the time may symbolize archetypal or mythological figures — as an example, the Queen of Hearts as Judith, who beheaded Holofernes in Biblical accounts. This element implies a connection to Boleyn, however doesn’t state it, for doing so could be a harmful historic invention, undermining the significance of drawing conclusions from empirical proof in artwork historic analysis. 

So many unsupported strategies threaten to undercut present’s historic integrity: for instance, the caption for Hans Holbein’s portrait of Margaret, Woman Butts, states that she “spent a long time navigating courtroom life since her first appointment to Princess Mary’s family.” It goes on to take a position, “it might have been this expertise, in addition to her and her husband’s curiosity in non secular reform, that inspired Katherine Parr to deliver Margaret into her circle.” 

The place we do have main sources, the wives neither converse their minds nor categorical company: A 1537 letter to Thomas Cromwell, described by the caption as ready in Jane Seymour’s identify, states matter of factly that she had “delivered and introduced in childbed a Prince,” whereas Katherine of Aragon signed a letter to Henry VIII, “your humble spouse and true servant.” The scale and, in lots of circumstances, high quality of their portraits additionally reveals their subservience. Katherine Howard’s 1540 miniature is dwarfed by the close by panel of Thomas Howard, third Duke of Norfolk (c. 1539), essentially the most highly effective peer of the realm and uncle to each Katherine and Anne Boleyn, and the entire portraits are missing in comparison with the mighty full size portraits, corresponding to Hans Holbein the Youthful’s “The Ambassadors” (1533) or that of Henry VIII himself (1537), from Holbein’s workshop. The wall captions acknowledge the patriarchal conference by noting that “marriage was not perceived as a union of equals within the Sixteenth century, and a queen consort couldn’t overlook that she was additionally the king’s topic.” 

Later depictions of the queens illustrate modifications in traditions, and replicate wider societal beliefs: William Lindsay Windus’s portray “Cranmer Endeavouring to Acquire a Confession of Guilt from Catherine Howard” (1849) drips in Victorian moralizing, for instance. Extra dynamic are costumes from stage productions, which convey the extent to which the queens’ undefined characters has allowed for a lot dramatic invention. A 1988 costume for an opera about “Anna Bolena,” first carried out in 1830, and the vastly anachronistic glitzy vinyl and spandex Katherine of Aragon costume for SIX the Musical, which premiered in 2017, current wildly differing variations of the ladies. 

Maybe this part’s most intriguing works are a sequence of pictures by the celebrated up to date photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto, which juxtapose Nineteen Eighties waxworks of the queens with attributes corresponding to staffs or musical devices. Their poses mimic their Tudor-era representations, however Sugimoto consists of their decrease our bodies and arms, proven in motion, lending them a level of obvious company. These pictures additionally encapsulate the exhibition’s overarching message, that we “use tales and our creativeness to learn portraits and bridge time.” 

Reductive descriptions opening every lady’s part considerably weaken the exhibition’s objective of fleshing out their experiences: Anne Boleyn was “essentially the most glad,” whereas Katherine Parr hoped “to be helpful in all I do.” In actual fact, this emphasizes how a lot these figures had been denied any vital private traits within the historic file. Given this impediment, the present demonstrates the significance of historiography, demonstrating that evolving interpretations of the Tudor interval have, maybe, influenced our notion of the time greater than historic truth itself.

Six Lives: The Tales of Henry VIII’s Queens continues on the Nationwide Portrait Gallery (St. Martin’s Place, London, England) by way of September 8. The exhibition was curated by Charlotte Bolland.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *